Racehorse Trainer

Venetia Williams

Venetia Williams is used by 2 syndicates in our directory. In 2026 syndicate horses trained by Venetia Williams ran 3 times and won 0 races, with 0 of 2 horses winning.

2syndicates
2syndicate horses ran in 2026
3runs for them
0races won

Syndicates Using Venetia Williams

2 syndicates or clubs in our directory list Venetia Williams as a trainer, name one of their horses with them, or have a share on sale in one of their horses.

Syndicate Horses Trained By Venetia Williams

2 syndicate horses ran for Venetia Williams in 2026 under a syndicate's own name, with the most wins first. Each has its own page with every run.

Venetia Williams: Trainer Form

Compare All Trainers →

Last 14 Days

12–25 Oct 2026

–

No runners in this period

Last 90 Days

28 Jul – 25 Oct 2026

–

No runners in this period

2026 So Far

1 Jan – 25 Oct 2026

7%

8 wins from 123 runs

Latest winner: Galop De Chasse, Ffos Las, 5 May 2026

Strike rate = wins ÷ runs, for every UK and Irish runner from this yard, for any owner, not just syndicates. From official race results, up to 25 Oct 2026. Abandoned and void races don't count. Results list this yard as “Miss V Williams”. Past results only.

Follow A Syndicate That Uses Venetia Williams

One short email on Saturday mornings, only in weeks when a syndicate you follow has news. See Follow A Syndicate.

Get The Syndicate Sheet

New shares as syndicates put them on sale, price changes and the week's syndicate winners. Free, every week.

Where This Comes From

Syndicates and trainers come from each syndicate's own website, its In The Paddock listing or 2026 official race results. Horses, runs and wins count only runs under a syndicate's own official owner name, from official race results compiled by RacingDatabase.com, 1 Jan 2026 to 25 Oct 2026, checked weekly. Official race results list this yard as “Miss V Williams”. For every run by this yard, for any owner, see Trainer Form. We do not publish ratings, tips or opinions about how a horse will run. Something wrong? Tell us and we will check it.

Keep Reading